Monday, 29 September 2014

Post 4: Normative References


Now let us turn our attention to normative references and the most frequently asked questions and commonly experienced problems. 

First, let's start with the basics:

What is a normative reference?
 
A normative reference is a document to which reference is made in such a way as to make it indispensable for the application of the standard. This therefore assumes that obtaining any document which is normatively referenced is essential for the proper implementation of the standard.

Normative references have to be referred to normatively in the body of the document at least once. See Table H.1 in the Internal Regulations Part 3 for precise guidance on how to express requirements.

To differentiate, an informative reference is either a document which is directly referenced in the standard, but the use of which is not indispensable for the application of the standard, or a document that the drafting body used as an informal source for the drafting of the text. Informative references should be listed in the bibliography.

The key question to ask when tackling normative references is whether the document you are referencing is in fact indispensable to the application of the standard and is it directly referenced at least once in the body of the text? Is it normative or informative?
How and where should I list normative references?
 
Normative references are listed in Clause 2 of CEN and CENELEC deliverables, however they are an optional element and are not essential.

Here is an example of how a normative reference should appear in Clause 2: 

EN 50539-11, Low-voltage surge protective devices – Surge protective devices for specific application including d.c. – Part 11: Requirements and tests for SPDs in photovoltaic applications

When does a normative reference have to be dated?
 
References need only to be dated when they are being used to refer to a specific element (e.g. clause, subclause, annex, numbered list entry), formula, table or figure in the referenced document. This is because a new edition of a standard may not have the exact same order of content as its previous version.

Where both normative and informative references are undated then the latest version of the referenced document, including any amendments applies.

It is essential that the normative references are as up-to-date as possible and that the latest version is used so that the published text remains state of the art. It is also essential that any document which is normatively referenced is publicly available and not at draft stage. 

In certain special cases, references may have to be dated, even though no specific element from it is mentioned. For example, in some cases deliverables are required to meet the Essential Requirements of New Approach Directives, in which case normative references which appear in a clause which is listed in the Annex ZA may need to be dated in Clause 2. 

This occasionally calls for a case-by-case approach during editing and a close collaboration between the editor, the drafting body and other stakeholders – e.g. Consultants.

If you have any queries about the document you are working on then feel free to drop us a line at production@cencenelec.eu

Where can I find the information regarding the most recent version of an EN and its title?
 
You can find all the necessary information on Projex-Online. Other helpful sources of information are the Search areas on the CEN website (http://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=CENWEB:105::RESET::::) and on the CENELEC website (http://www.cenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=104:107:2583858426572501::::FSP_LANG_ID:25).

What if I have a normative reference which is not a CEN, CENELEC, ETSI, ISO or IEC standard?
 
Are you drafting a CENELEC EN?  There is a CENELEC Guide 10 that has been adopted by the Technical Board and gives the relevant information: http://www.cenelec.eu/membersandexperts/referencematerial/cenelecguides.html.

Are you drafting a CEN EN? The responsible Technical Committee has to take a formal TC Decision.  The formatted decision can be found in Section 2.2 on the following page of the CEN BOSS website: http://boss.cen.eu/reference%20material/FormattedDecisions/Pages/default.aspx and must be returned to CCMC at: tcminares@cencenelec.eu.

Summary 

To recap here is a handy summary that includes some of the key points to keep in mind when considering normative references:

o   Optional element
o   List documents which are indispensable for the application of the standard

o   Date references if they refer to a specific element in another document, e.g. table, figure…

o   Refer preferably to other European Standards

o   Standards from other organizations can be referenced under certain conditions

o   Normative references must be referred to normatively in the body of the text at least once in order to appear in Clause 2

o   Avoid references to:

o   drafts (unpublished work)

o   documents that are not publicly available

o   documents that are referred to informatively

o   documents that have served as background material in the preparation of the document

Normative references can be a difficult aspect of drafting standards and the Editors at CCMC are always here to provide you with support on any queries you might have throughout the drafting process. 

Any questions about the topics covered in this post? Post us a comment!

And don’t forget to follow us – next week we will be blogging about terms and definitions…




© All CCMC posted information is copyrighted by CEN and/or CENELEC.  Extracts may be used providing that the source is mentioned.
Please note that the CCMC posted information is drawn from a variety of sources already publicly available on the CEN and CENELEC websites.

 

1 comment:

  1. Having discussed this subject at great length in IEC and in industry, I
    agree that the advantages and disadvantages of voluntarily dating
    references (i.e. where the rules don't compel dating) are fairly evenly
    balanced.

    BUT the big advantage for the user of the standard is that they
    definitely know which edition of the referenced standard applies, and,
    especially, those in industry who do not participate in standards work
    are very grateful for this.

    In addition, at a higher 'philosophical' level, no committee can be
    quite certain that all future editions of an undated standard will be
    correctly applicable.

    In IEC TC100, as General Maintenance Manager I am trying to get
    committees to regularly (annually?) check the references (both dated and
    undated) in their standards for continuing validity. It is nominally a
    task for the Secretariat, but there seems no reason why the task should
    not be divided among a number of *reliable* committee members.

    The editors responded and I answered:

    >Please be aware though that the use of undated references is all the
    >more useful when a text has to be reviewed or consolidated; having all
    >the references dated would make the reviewing or consolidating of a
    >text far more complex.

    I disagree that it is useful; instead, it is risky. By just accepting
    the undated references, **without checking that the latest version of
    each is still correct and relevant**, the reviewer is in danger of
    allowing a standard with a serious error to be published. It might not
    happen very often, but it ought not to happen at all, and fate decrees
    that it will happen in a safety standard, where it matters very much.

    The checking of numerous dated referenced standards to see whether they
    have been superseded and if the new versions are still relevant is also
    time-consuming, ** but if it is not done, the standard that makes the
    references is not in error**.

    If numerous undated referenced standards are not checked, the standard
    that makes the references is quite likely to be in error.

    The editors replied and I responsed again:

    >Furthermore, still in the case of a review, all the references have to
    >be thoroughly checked, even if they are undated. This approach may be
    >time-consuming, I agree, but it has to be seen as a necessary
    >discipline to ensure the new version of the text will be "state of the
    >art".

    This seems to be inconsistent with what you wrote before:

    "Please be aware though that the use of undated references is all the
    more useful when a text has to be reviewed or consolidated; having all
    the references dated would make the reviewing or consolidating of a text
    far more complex."

    It seems no less complex to review the undated references as the dated
    ones. Your statement above seemed to imply that undated references need
    not be checked, making the review task easier.

    ReplyDelete